Which of the following situations would likely require reasonable accommodation?

The request for a service animal despite a no-pets policy is a clear example of a situation that would likely require reasonable accommodation under the Fair Housing Act. This legislation mandates that housing providers must make exceptions to their policies when necessary to accommodate individuals with disabilities. Service animals are recognized under the law as necessary aids for individuals with disabilities, providing support that enables them to live independently and with dignity.

In this context, a service animal often plays a crucial role in the tenant's ability to perform daily activities related to their disability. As such, denying this request would not only unfairly restrict the tenant’s rights but could also constitute discrimination based on disability. The principle of reasonable accommodation allows for these exceptions to ensure that individuals with disabilities have equal access to housing.

The other scenarios presented do not fall under the same legal protections or requirements for reasonable accommodations. Painting an apartment or requesting a lease extension are typically considered matters of personal preference or tenancy terms that do not directly relate to a disability. Similarly, requesting a closer parking space is often viewed as a convenience rather than a necessary modification to allow for equal access in housing.