Understanding steering in real estate: how guiding buyers by race harms housing options

Steering happens when agents guide buyers toward or away from neighborhoods based on race. Learn why this discriminatory behavior harms equal access, how to spot it in showings and marketing, and how ethical real estate promotes true housing choice. Explore real-world safeguards and guidelines.

Steering isn’t a villain you notice at first glance. It’s the kind of misstep that can slip into everyday conversations and make housing feel less open than it should be. In the real estate world, steering shows up when the way we guide clients toward neighborhoods is colored by race, ethnicity, or other protected traits. The moment that bias affects choices, the door shuts on equal opportunity—even if no one meant to be unfair.

Steering in plain language: what would you do?

Let me explain with a simple idea from a recent scenario. If you’re counseling a client to consider a neighborhood because of the racial makeup, that’s steering. The prompt you gave points to that exact example as the correct choice: A. Encouraging clients to consider neighborhoods based on racial makeup. It’s a red flag because it nudges people toward, or away from, places based on who lives there—not on the property’s features, price, schools, amenities, or the client’s own preferences.

Now, what about the other options? They’re not steering in themselves, though they still deserve careful handling to stay fair:

  • B. Showing all clients the same properties regardless of background. This is the gold standard of non-discriminatory service. It keeps options broad and avoids bias shaping the choice.

  • C. Only marketing properties to high-income individuals. On the surface, this isn’t steering based on race or ethnicity, but it can raise fairness questions if it excludes qualified buyers from other backgrounds. The key thing is whether the targeting is based on legitimate, neutral criteria (like price range or financing options) rather than exclusionary motives.

  • D. Hosting open houses in various neighborhoods. Neutral by intent, this helps demonstrate a willingness to show homes across communities and reduces the risk of steering. It’s a practical way to widen exposure and avoid stereotyping any area.

Why steering matters beyond ethics

Steering isn’t just a legal risk; it also chips away at trust. Clients rely on professionals to present options fairly, explain pros and cons, and let them decide where to live based on their needs. When choices get narrowed by bias, it isn’t just about a single sale. It’s about communities and the expectation that everyone has an equal shot at housing opportunities.

Here’s the human side of the issue: neighborhoods are more than maps. They’re about schools, commute times, parks, safety, and the vibe you feel when you walk down the street. If we start reducing a neighborhood to a racial profile, we’re shortcutting someone’s chance to weigh those real-life factors. That’s why steering is a blind spot for many well-meaning professionals. It sneaks in when we rely on assumptions rather than questions, data, and a broad set of options.

A quick tour of how steering can sneak in (and how to catch it)

  • Assumptions masquerading as advice: If a client says they want “a neighborhood with a certain vibe,” and you push them toward or away from areas because of who lives there, you’ve crossed a line. The vibe can be legitimate, but it should be about personal preferences (schools, noise levels, walkability), not demographics.

  • Narrow showing lists: If your MLS search results in a tight slate that’s heavily weighted toward one area for reasons tied to identity rather than suitability, that’s steering in disguise.

  • Biased language in listings or conversations: Phrases that hint at who “belongs” where, or what type of buyer a neighborhood attracts, can nudge clients in biased directions even if the facts look neutral on the surface.

  • Nontransparent marketing: If ads or outreach are tailored in a way that excludes certain groups, even unintentionally, the fairness thread starts to fray.

Your toolbox for fair housing in real life

  • Standardize the process: Create a clear showings protocol that begins with a broad, diverse set of neighborhoods. Use the same criteria for every client, and document why each property was shown or not shown.

  • Separate needs from assumptions: Ask open-ended questions to uncover the client’s true priorities—budget, commute, school quality, safety—without presuming what a neighborhood is like for any group.

  • Use neutral, inclusive language: Marketing materials should describe features (square footage, amenities, transport links) rather than imply who should or shouldn’t live there.

  • Show a range, not a rhythm: If you’re presenting options, include properties from multiple neighborhoods so clients can compare on the merits that matter to them.

  • Track your listings and showings: Keep a log of which properties were shown to whom, and watch for patterns that might indicate bias in the process. If you spot a trend, adjust quickly.

  • Training that sticks: Regular, practical training on unconscious bias, fair housing laws, and compliant showing practices helps teams stay sharp and aligned.

A practical, everyday approach (a lightweight script you can adapt)

  • Client: “We want a quiet area near good schools, but we’re open to different neighborhoods.”

  • Agent: “Great. Let’s start with three solid options in different neighborhoods that fit your budget and commute. I’ll also bring in a couple more areas that match your priorities—like access to parks and easy transit. If you see something you like, we’ll compare the features, not the backgrounds of the people who live there.”

  • Client: “That sounds fair.”

  • Agent: “Perfect. I’ll share a neutral list and explain how each property checks off your criteria. If we ever feel a neighborhood isn’t a fit for the right reasons, we’ll reassess together, using the same objective lens for everyone.”

Staying curious, staying fair

Steering often shows up as a quiet concern—tiny, almost whisper-level decisions that add up over time. A good rule of thumb: if a recommendation feels like it’s steering toward a group rather than toward what the client actually wants, pause, reframe, and bring your criteria back to objective facts. Ask yourself: are we talking about price, features, and practical needs, or about assumptions tied to demographics?

Fair housing isn’t just about avoiding a legal pitfall. It’s about building trust and expanding opportunity. When clients feel informed, respected, and truly heard, they’re more likely to become loyal advocates—spreading the word about fair, inclusive service that treats every buyer with the same respect.

Tying it back to everyday life

Think about shopping for something big—say, a car or a home improvement project. You’d want the salesperson to present options that fit your budget, your preferences, and your life, not to steer you toward a choice because of the color you wear or the neighborhood you might come from. Housing should operate the same way: clear options, honest information, and room to make a decision that’s genuinely yours.

Common pitfalls to remember

  • Don’t rely on stereotypes in place of data. If you don’t have a solid reason rooted in needs and affordability, skip the quick assumption.

  • Don’t tailor outreach to exclude groups, even indirectly. Marketing that silently targets a demographic while ignoring others undermines fairness.

  • Don’t keep quiet about concerns you notice. If a colleague hints at bias or you sense a steering pattern, call it out and discuss a better approach.

A final thought about the bigger picture

Fair housing values aren’t a checklist you skim and file away. They’re a living standard—one that guides how we talk about neighborhoods, how we present options, and how we treat every potential homeowner with equal respect. Steering is more than a mistake; it’s a missed opportunity to help people build home and community on their own terms.

If you’re diving into these topics, keep the core idea close: neighborhoods should be explored for their real attributes, not for who lives there. That approach doesn’t just protect clients—it strengthens the trust and reputation you build as a professional who cares about every family’s chance to find a place to call home. And honestly, that kind of trust—that’s the steady fuel for good work in real estate.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy