If federal fair housing law and state fair housing law are not a match, which law takes precedence?

When federal fair housing law and state fair housing law differ, the principle that federal law serves as the minimum requirement is key. This means that federal law establishes a baseline of protections against discrimination in housing, and states can enact laws that provide greater protections or lower limits on discriminatory practices.

This concept is rooted in the hierarchy of laws where federal legislation often sets a standard that states must at least comply with, but states have the authority to expand upon this framework. Therefore, if a state law offers broader protections against unfair housing practices than federal law, the state law will be applicable and enforceable. This ensures that individuals in a particular state may have access to additional rights and protections, promoting a more equitable housing environment.

In essence, the correct answer reflects the understanding that while federal law provides a foundational level of protection, states have the flexibility to enact laws that offer greater safeguards to their residents.